17 October 2024 posted by Recovery Partners
Poor organisational change management means poorly planned, communicated, supported or managed changes. Change management becomes a hazard when it is handled very poorly, drawn out or happens like clockwork every three to six months.
Poor organisational change can be manifested in psychosocial hazards that could cause either or both psychological and physical harm to workers. Stress generated by workers going through organisational change that is happening frequently or is ongoing can result in harm to the workers. Stress can cause physical injuries to workers like musculoskeletal, chronic fatigue or substance abuse and psychological injuries to workers like anxiety, depression, insomnia, mood swings or Post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD).
Psychosocial hazards can interact or combine with other hazards, increasing the risk of harm and the likelihood of adverse outcomes. For example addition of either overtime or a night shift when the workload increases can result in fatigue, stress or anxiety which increases the risk of a severe injury occurring.
Causes of Poor Organisational Change Management
Drilling down further into what can cause poor organisation change, we can see:
- Lack of consultation with workers on planned changes and consideration of their views on the changes
- The impact of the changes on workers and the WHS risk of the changes or workers’ productivity e.g. A new process put in place with insufficient or no training provided
- The changes are poorly executed e.g. no set project plan, timeline or objectives set.
- Poor communication of changes – little or no information provided to managers and workers about the changes and why the changes are needed
- Inadequate support provided to workers e.g. lack of documentation or training on new systems or tools/equipment
Ways of Assessing the Risk of Poor Organisational Change Management in the WorkplaceÂ
- Consulting with Stakeholders
- Different stakeholders may see hazards in different ways or forms e.g. Physical Risk, the process or equipment use risk, implementation
- Use of organisational or Worker Impact survey’s either before or after the changes are to be implemented
- Observing task and worker behaviours e.g. are task completion times taking longer to complete than estimated or increase in worker gossip around the changes; more errors or downtime due to worker confusion about how to close out the processes
- Run reports on organisation data and look for trends. For example, are there changes to overtime hours or Sick Leave, injuries, incidents, hazards and Lost time Injuries or Claims.Â
- Look at the frequency of workers’ hours or headcount against the hazards e.g. increase or decrease in hazards being reported against the risk assessment outcomes and likelihood.
Possible Ways of Controlling the Risk of Poor Organisational Change in the Workplace
Consultation
- Consult as early as possible on upcoming changes
- Identify which workers, customers or Suppliers will be or can be affected by the proposed changes and impacts.
- Consult with these workers, customers and suppliers on the proposed changes and impacts.
Timeframe
- Introduce the changes – Training and Trials before going live
- Allow for time for workers to be settled and confident in the changes before looking for changes in performance from workers
- Confirm timing to customers and suppliers on the change’s introduction
ManagementÂ
- Senior management provides clarity and support during change management by discussing issues raised by workers and taking these on board.
- Allow time for feedback and discussion on the changes from workers
- Senior Management to show empathy to worker, customer or supplier frustration and help with any challenges identified by these parties
- Ensure any changes proposed or introduced are fair and reasonable (workload evenly distributed) and do not target certain workers or workgroups
- Review controls in place to ensure that they are working as planned and have not created more hazards and risks to control.
ConclusionÂ
For the PCBU, when Change Management is done correctly with early interventions and consultation with workers, the workers know that there is help available to them with extra support when needed during the change process.
For workers, it is that they have confidence in their senior leaders that if they do suffer from an injury either physical or mental-health related as a result of the change-management process they will be supported and provided with assistance to recover to pre-injury duties. For additional information about addressing Workplace Change Management, check out these resources from SafeWork Australia and Comcare.Â
How We Can Help
Recovery Partners provides psychosocial safety services.
- ISO 45003 Psychosocial system gap analysis/ audit
- Psychosocial/ culture surveys
- Psychosocial risk assessments and profiling
- Psychosocial training
- Policy and procedure development
As part of the processes, Recovery Partners reviews and audits policies and procedures. Download our free Psychosocial Checklist today.Â
Want to find out more?
Our services are available nationwide. Our consultants love to have a chat, so go ahead and give us a call on 1300 OHS RTW (647 789) or email enquiries@rrp.com.au
You may be interested in:
Disclaimer – these articles are provided to supply general safety information to people responsible for OHS in their organisation. They are general in nature and do not substitute for legal and/or professional advice. We always suggest that organisations obtain information specific to their needs. Additional information can be found at https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/Â
Recent Posts
How Active Therapy Helped Sarah Return to Work After a Shoulder Injury
8 November 2024What are a PCBU’s WHS duties in a Contractual Chain?Â
28 October 2024Safe Workplaces and External Factors Key Takeaways
23 October 2024Why Should Companies do Pre-Employments?
10 October 2024What is an EAP and how does it work?